The new pact between Türkiye, Qatar, Pakistan, and Indonesia brings money and military technology together in ways New Delhi will have to track carefully

Türkiye, Qatar, Pakistan, and Indonesia signed the ‘Badr’ defense cooperation accord in the Qatari capital, Doha, on October 21. It is intended to deepen their defense industry cooperation, reflecting a broader effort by countries in the region to widen their network of security partners amid the prolonged US-Israel war on Iran.

The four countries are planning to build on existing military projects through joint production, technology transfers, and more closely integrated supply chains. The initiative is a result of the failure of the US and Iran to reach a concrete peace agreement, which pushes countries in the region to diversify their defense partnerships and look beyond overreliance on Washington for their security.

The four countries clarified, however, that closer cooperation does not mean abandoning long-standing alliances. Instead, the ambition is to gain greater control over their own security while strengthening pre-existing partnerships.

The implications could extend well beyond the four participants. It will impact both the Gulf Region and South East Asia. India, for instance, has been watching the Mecca Accord which earlier brought Türkiye, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia together. Now, Badr brings in Indonesia, a country with the largest Muslim population, and with which New Delhi is involved in practical cooperation, including in the defense sector.

Inside the military pacts

The Mecca Joint Defense Agreement (also known as the Mecca Pact), is a trilateral security pact concluded in August by Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan and covering collective defense, military and intelligence cooperation, defense-industrial development, logistical support, and institutional coordination. The Mutual Defense Clause in the document is modelled similarly to NATO’s Article 5, stipulating that an armed attack against any one of the three member states is regarded as an attack against them all.

Read more US-Russia cooperation in Arctic: Why energy-hungry economies have big hopes

The Mecca Pact builds directly upon the bilateral Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA) signed between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in September 2025. Now, the trilateral alliance combines Saudi capital and energy influence, Turkish defense and drone technology, and Pakistani military manpower and strategic (nuclear) capabilities. Pakistan approved the pact, and the Turkish government officially submitted the 16-article text of the pact to the Turkish Parliament for ratification. Senior foreign and defense officials from all three nations have held committee meetings (including sessions in Istanbul and Riyadh) to coordinate implementation timelines, intelligence-sharing frameworks, and rapid-deployment logistics amid ongoing regional security tensions.

The Badr Accord (officially the Badr Memorandum of Understanding) is a joint defense cooperation agreement with a core goal to deepen military and defense industrial collaboration, move past simple “off-the-shelf” arms purchases, and build shared domestic manufacturing and technological capabilities. Focus areas include joint production of military hardware (including drones and precision missiles, airborne radars, air defense systems, and rockets).

Unlike the Mecca Accord’s mutual defense focus, the Badr Accord focuses primarily on defense-industrial cooperation rather than an automatic collective-defense trigger. The pact is designed to reduce the nations’ reliance on external Western or foreign arms suppliers and pool their complementary manufacturing strengths. Each country will bring its own resources or set of skills to the table. Türkiye contributes technological expertise, systems integration, and a mature defense industry; Pakistan and Indonesia offer manufacturing capacity, skilled workforces, and sizeable domestic markets; and Qatar provides investment potential and demand.

Such arrangements could give buyers a larger role in producing and supporting their own equipment, while providing manufacturers with longer-term orders and investment. This could bring down costs for Turkish companies and bring jobs to Pakistan and Indonesia, while tapping into Qatari financial muscle.

Pakistan’s existing naval manufacturing project with Türkiye is an example of how weapons purchases can support domestic manufacturing. Of the four ships announced under the project, two are to be built in Istanbul and two at Karachi Shipyard. Türkiye and Indonesia are meanwhile jointly building a tank.

Islamic symbolism

While the Badr Accord functions strictly as an industrial framework for joint weapons production, its nomenclature is deeply rooted in Islamic religious and historical symbolism. The accord derives its name directly from the Battle of Badr (624 CE), the most consequential and spiritually significant early military engagement in Islamic history. In Islamic tradition, the Battle of Badr represents a foundational victory where a small, under-equipped group of early Muslims (around 313 men) defeated a much larger, well-armed Meccan Quraysh army (around 1,000 men) through steadfast faith and divine intervention. By choosing the name for the pact, the signatory nations explicitly invoke themes of resilience, unity, and overcoming asymmetric structural disadvantages.

Read more Saudi Arabia’s biggest problem may be its enemy’s smallest weapons

The accord mirrors the civilizational alignment and focuses heavily on the practical pan-Islamic integration of defense manufacturing. The timing and religious framing of the Badr Accord reflect a collective push among these prominent Islamic republics and monarchies to build an autonomous “Islamic security layer.”

The word “Badr,” which literally translates to “full moon” in Arabic, was chosen to symbolize how the four distinct nations complement one another. The agreement aims to promote cooperation in military production, strengthen military capabilities, and support collaboration in technical military training and research and development, the Turkish Defense Ministry said.

Türkiye, under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has actively staked a claim to leadership in the Islamic world by presenting itself as the modern heir to the Ottoman Empire and the defender of global Muslim causes. Erdogan frequently champions the Palestinian cause, opposes Western policies in the Middle East, and speaks out on issues affecting minority Muslim populations such as the Uyghurs and Rohingya, and supports Pakistan on Kashmir. As a part of NATO, Türkiye has the most developed military industry while it faces heavy competition and deep-seated political rivalry from nations like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, and the UAE.

Saudi Arabia is not only a significant petro-dollar economy and one of the world’s top three largest defense importers, the King of Saudi Arabia also holds the title of Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, which represents the monarch’s official responsibility for protecting and maintaining the two holiest sites in Islam.

Indonesia has the world’s largest Muslim population, with approximately 251.25 million Muslims. Pakistan follows it with a Muslim population of 231 to 234 million people. Pakistan also has the seventh largest military and possesses the so called “Islamic bomb” (nuclear weapons).

Badr Accord limitations and complexities

As the Badr pact relies on deep, cross-border integration rather than traditional arms buying, it faces several foundational limitations and operational complexities. The Badr Accord is explicitly a defense-industrial and technology co-production framework, not a military alliance. Signatories are under no obligation to intervene militarily if another member is attacked.

While the goal is to bypass Western arms suppliers, many advanced defense systems produced by nations like Türkiye still incorporate critical subsystems (such as engines, optics, or microchips) patented or licensed by NATO allies. The Pakistani military is dominated by Chinese and American equipment.

The pact faces a structural ceiling if Western nations enforce strict end-user export restrictions on components required for joint production.

Read more A coup in Poland? Here’s what the power struggle is really about

The four signatory nations operate under highly distinct regional geopolitical realities and maintain overlapping alliances. A shared Islamic cultural identity provides a diplomatic bridge, but it does not equate to a unified foreign policy. For instance, Indonesia maintains a delicate balance in the Indo-Pacific, Qatar navigates complex Gulf-Iran relations, and Türkiye balances its NATO commitments.

The pact relies on a complex, multi-layered decision-making process. Individual nations must first identify their distinct defense needs. These are sent to an “Executive Board” to map out joint production designs, which must then clear a “Strategic Board” tasked with finalizing budgets and allocating manufacturing locations. Managing national bureaucratic red tape across four geographically dispersed nations will naturally slow down project timelines.

Qatar is unlikely to abandon its strategic relationship with Washington, while Türkiye seeks greater technological independence within NATO, not autonomy from it. Türkiye, which has NATO’s second-largest army and a robust defense industry, has been helping Gulf nations, including Qatar, where it has a military base, bolster their defenses amid the Iran war.

A major complexity will be navigating intellectual property (IP) sharing. While the accord calls for technology transfers, high-tech hubs like Türkiye must balance regional goodwill against the risk of losing ownership of their proprietary R&D. Ensuring that financial backers (Qatar) and manufacturers (Pakistan/Indonesia) feel equity is distributed fairly remains a tough hurdle. Joint production facilities are primarily slated to be established in Türkiye due to its superior industrial infrastructure. This creates a logistical and operational imbalance. Harmonizing industrial output, supply chains, and technical military training protocols across disparate manufacturing floors in Islamabad, Jakarta, and Istanbul will test the pact’s long-term viability.

Implications for India

During the most recent military conflict between India in Pakistan in May 2025, Türkiye openly supported Pakistan with military hardware and technical support. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia signed the bilateral Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement in September, just four months after the standoff between New Delhi and Islamabad.

Perhaps, Pakistan was as desperate for security support as Saudi Arabia. In case of a future skirmish, will Türkiye and Saudi Arabia provide more material support or even send in troops, if requested?

Read more India is running out of time on fifth-generation fighter

Under the Mecca Accord, Pakistan is bound to support and defend Saudi Arabia against unprovoked aggression or a spillover of the Yemen conflict into Saudi territory. Pakistan’s substantial military personnel and resources are already stationed in Saudi Arabia. The reality on the ground is that while Islamabad has condemned Houthi missile and drone strikes on Saudi infrastructure and signaled readiness to implement collective deterrence measures, its active military involvement has largely focused on regional defense cooperation, logistics, intelligence sharing, and air defense support rather than open-ended offensive ground wars inside Yemen

While the Mecca Accord focuses on collective deterrence and military cooperation, the Doha Accord could provide the industrial and technological foundations for such partnerships. Such cooperation could also create economies of scale. The arrangement could help Pakistan and Indonesia manufacture more equipment domestically while giving Turkish defense companies access to larger markets and longer-term orders.

Pakistan already gets military technology support from China. This additional support will help Pakistan bridge the military capability gap with India as Islamabad could use the Badr agreement to strengthen its military capabilities through partnerships beyond Beijing, helping it to reduce the existing dependence.

Türkiye is particularly important in this context because of its experience in drones, electronic warfare, naval platforms, and other defense systems. It will also boost the Pakistani defense industry.

India would have to factor this into its defense planning, particularly if Pakistan becomes better equipped to sustain its military capabilities over the long term. For Islamabad, access to technology, joint production, and external markets could help sustain an industry constrained by economic pressures and dependence on imported components. If these relationships generate tangible advances in unmanned systems, electronic warfare, sensors, naval capabilities, or precision weapons, New Delhi will need to account for them in its threat assessments.

Indonesia’s participation in the Badr agreement could affect India’s own defense partnerships with Jakarta. In July, India and Indonesia announced a $630 million deal under which India would supply BrahMos cruise missiles and Astra air-to-air missiles. The concern is whether Indonesia could share information about Indian weapons with the other Badr participants, including Pakistan, potentially giving Islamabad access to sensitive technical knowledge.

READ MORE: India’s refining boom finds an opportunity in the global diesel crunch

Yet the obstacles are substantial. Defense industries compete for export markets, protect proprietary technologies, and operate under varying financial and regulatory constraints. The four countries also have distinct security priorities and external relationships.

Indian diplomacy has handled its global relations well. Saudi Arabia and Indonesia are already working closely with India on economic front. The Badr and Mecca pacts should not be seen as strategic encirclement of India.

New Delhi’s policies such as Make-in-India and Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) are already bringing results, while India continues partnering with Russia, US, and European nations for many projects and technologies. India has advantages in the scale of its industrial base.

While overtly visible, India should, for the moment, not look at these pacts through a religious prism until they prove otherwise. The pacts are still at a very early stage. The Mecca Accord is already under test against Houthis. Badr will take long to evolve. It is a wait and watch stage for India and it must continue diplomatic engagement with military and industrial growth as a deterrent.